Archive

Author Archive

Relocation Extension: This is happening, people. UGH

February 24th, 2011 7 comments

Mark Kreidler is on top of the Maloofs filing for an extension to look over Anaheim’s offer of having the team move there.

While this sounds bad, it’s not a terrible sign. All it means is the team is looking into relocation. It doesn’t mean they will relocate.

At the same time, this sucks. There is no real deadline for when the Maloofs have to file for relocation with the extension being approved. According to Kreidler’s timeline, it could go through the end of the season.

It makes very little sense to me that the Kings would end up in Anaheim. They don’t really have this brand new immaculate arena for the Maloofs’ disposal and the territory is already filled with Lakers fans, bandwagon Lakers fans, Clipper Darrel, bandwagon Blake Griffin fans and Jimmy Goldstein. Unless the Kings are a proven winner, the people down there aren’t really going to flock to this team just because they’re new. Yes, it’s the second biggest media market in the country and there are probably 18 times as many people in the LA area as there are in the Sacramento area, but I just don’t see the Kings becoming this staple (no pun intended with the Staples Center) of Southern California basketball.

At the same time, the Maloofs clearly are interested and if they feel one-third of the LA market is more profitable than the entire Sacramento market, they’ll pack up the trucks and turn this place into the new Seattle.

This really sucks. I understand it’s just the Maloofs looking into their options and it gives the Taylor/ICON duo a chance to show their plan without the Kings already making up their minds. It just would be really unfortunate for the ownership to turn their back on this city for a crowded area.

Check out Kreidler’s timeline and Sam Amick’s timeline for updates and good information on this development.

Categories: Relocation Tags:

Marcus Thornton Scouting Report

February 23rd, 2011 9 comments

Our good friends at Hornets 24/7 have been kind enough to exchange scouting reports with us on the key components of the latest Kings trade. They’ll have words from me on Carl Landry in a short while.

Here is what Michael Mcnamara says about what the Kings are getting with Thornton:

From an outsiders perspective, the story of Marcus Thornton’s 2010-2011 must seem somewhat confusing. Here’s a guy that was second team All-Rookie the previous year, coming off a second half that saw him average 20 PPG, competing with journeymen Marco Belinelli and Willie Green for a starting two guard spot, and yet his minutes are inconsistent and his numbers are down across the board.

More often than not, NBA players make “the leap” in their second year, and many expected that from Thornton this season, as evidenced by the fact that he was a sixth round pick in most fantasy drafts during the offseason. Little did they know that the hiring of Monty Williams essentially doomed Marcus from the start, as the coach’s heavy emphasis on defense was just not a match for a player who readily admitted that he had never had a coach spend time with him working on that aspect of his game.

Thornton dug himself a huge hole in the summer by intentionally skipping some of Monty’s “voluntary” defensive meetings. Thornton took the term voluntary too literally, and because of that he was way behind when training camp started. Veterans Willie Green and Marco Belinelli don’t have one-third of the offensive potential that Marcus has, but they made an impact on the defensive end and because of that Thornton’s playing time has been spotty all season long.

It was no secret to Hornets fans that Thornton would likely be moved before the trade deadline, as he is a restricted free agent this summer and it was unlikely that the Hornets would match any substantial offer, since he just does not fit in with the philosophy that GM Dell Demps and Monty Williams are trying to install with this franchise. He is, however, an extremely talented offensive player that Kings fans will come to love as long as they can accept the fact that he will likely only make an impact on one end of the court.

Offense:

The majority of Thornton’s scoring will either take place behind the arc or at the rim. He is a streaky three-point shooter who can get hot from distance, and unlike most three-point shooters, he is actually better at creating his own shot than he is at spotting up and waiting for someone else to get him a look. Thornton is one of maybe only 20 or 30 players in the entire league who is capable of going off for twenty points in a quarter, and a large part of that is because of his ability to get his own shot off the dribble.

While he is dangerous from deep, Thornton is surprisingly ineffective from mid-range. He actually has shot a higher percentage from three than he has from 16-23 feet out, and a large part of that seems to be because of his inability to control his body when attacking a defense. He seems to only have two modes: slow and deliberate or full speed. The majority of his offense starts with him getting the ball behind the arc and waiting for a big to set a screen. From there, he either creates an off balance three for himself or he attacks the basket at a supersonic speed. If he chooses the latter and a defender gets in his path to take a charge, Marcus lacks the ability to stop on a dime for a mid-range shot or shoot a floater in the lane.

As far as his passing ability, Marcus can make the fantastic pass and he can make the horrible pass. What he seems to lack is the ability to make a solid pass or collect “hockey assists.” A team that depends on a lot of ball movement, swinging the ball around the arc, runs a lot of motion plays, etc. would not be a good fit for Thornton. He is a black hole in a lot of ways when he touches the ball, although he will sometimes surprise you with an exciting no look pass to a big when the defense collapses on him in the lane.

The Hornets were forced to play him at backup point guard at times last season when CP3 went down, and it wasn’t pretty. He is not a creator or a facilitator, and it took away from what he does best. When he started alongside Collison, however, and was given the freedom to shoot, he put up 19.8 PPG and did not hurt the team with turnovers. Despite a relatively high usage rate, Thornton only turned the ball over one time per 36 minutes, mostly because once the ball got into his hands, the only way it was going to leave his hands was if it was a shot. No passes, no turnovers.

Defense:

Have you ever seen a fly stuck to a glue trap? If so, then you can imagine what Marcus Thornton looks like playing defense. In all my years of watching basketball, I have never seen a player who gets caught on screens like Marcus Thornton. It seems as if he cannot make up his mind whether to go over or under screens, so he just plows right into the middle of defenders and gets stuck there. It has been a habit that has drove Monty Williams crazy all season, and has often got Thornton the quick hook.

When Thornton is on one of his hot streaks, it is very easy to overlook his defense, but when he is not giving you a scoring spark it is hard to justify keeping Thornton on the floor. The last Kings/ Hornets matchup was a perfect example. I know most people remember that game as being the DeMarcus Cousins show, but there was a stretch when the Hornets had gotten back into the game in the 3rd quarter, but just couldn’t get over the hump. Luther Head drained some big shots, got to the bucket for an And One, and generally took over those last two or three crucial minutes in the third. Guess who was guarding him?

Now I am not bashing Head, but if you can’t guard him, how are you going to slow Ginobli or Kobe or even James Harden come playoff time? With a team built around defense, Thornton just wasn’t a good fit even off the bench, because he lacked the ability to even guard role players. On the plus side, Thornton is one of the most tenacious defensive rebounders I have ever seen pound for pound, inch for inch. This season he is averaging nearly 7 rebounds per 36 minutes, which is fantastic for a guy his size. Beyond the stats, just using the eyeball test, he is a guy that attacks the boards and seems to get rebounds in big moments in games. He has tenacity and a determination that is uncommon for guys his size and this, more than anything else, makes him a fan favorite.

Intangibles:

Marcus Thornton is a great locker room guy who is liked by players, but he has a personality and an immaturity that rubs coaches the wrong way (I am sure that sounds familiar to Kings fans). The guys love him and he seems to have fun on the court, but there just does not seem to be that fire burning inside of Thornton that will make him do whatever it takes to be an elite player or to be a winner.

I don’t want to assume that Thornton would rather get his stats than win, but it is interesting to note that the Hornets actually won more the less Thornton played last season and in that 28 game stretch at the end of the season when Thornton averaged over 20 PPG, the Hornets were 8-20. This year, the Hornets actually had a better record when Thornton played over 15 minutes than when he played under 15 minutes, but the difference was not substantial.

Another concern for the Kings might be the fact that Marcus Thornton has been a beast at New Orleans this season, but he has been horrible on the road. Thornton is from Louisiana, he played ball at LSU, and he has dozens of family and friends who attend every home game, which gives him added incentive.  At home this year, he is averaging 11 PPG on 47% shooting, while also hitting 47% of his shots from three. On the road he is averaging 5 PPG on 33% shooting and 21% from three. To say that he is more effective in his home games would be an understatement. On the plus side, the Kings do play at New Orleans Arena one more time this season!

Overall:

Thornton has the potential to be an elite scorer in this league if he can develop a mid range game and he can get more creative when he attacks the paint. These are the two things that separate him from the Jason Terry’s and Ben Gordon’s of the world. With some maturity and fine-tuning, he can definitely evolve into that type of player, but the question is whether he will work hard enough on his game to become that kind of player.  If he does, it might be a little easier to forgive his lack of ability on the defensive end.

From Marc Stein: Landry could be heading to N’Awlins

February 22nd, 2011 3 comments

Hello Marcus Thornton and David Andersen?

Categories: Transaction Talk Tags:

Regret me, regret me not

February 15th, 2011 1 comment
Arco Arena
Nick Hunt/Sacramento Press
Arco Arena sign removed. Hopefully Kings won’t be too.


Commissioner David Stern was on the BS Report with Bill Simmons
this week and started discussing NBA arena situations briefly.

Bill Simmons – And you said on the last podcast that you had some regrets with how Vancouver went the last go around.

David Stern – I have both regrets about Vancouver and Seattle.

BS – You have regrets about Seattle? You’ve never said that.

DS – Oh yes, I did.

BS – What are your regrets?

DS – My regrets are that somehow we weren’t able to do a better job of getting a building moved around so that we could have kept a team there.

Roughly four years ago, the NBA stepped in to save the Sacramento Kings by getting involved with an initiative. After a putridly misguided attempt to put an arena at Cal Expo and then the complicated land swap that fell apart to keep the sanctity of eating deep-fried Snickers bars with people in sleeveless t-shirts and jean shorts in an appropriately sized setting, the NBA pulled out of the arena dealings in late September of last year.

I would never imply that the NBA didn’t give a proper effort to the arena situation because anyone who has been following knows just how complicated it is. Everybody seems to want a downtown arena, only the downtown area is need of a major facelift if a brand new state of the art arena is going to replace the K Street Mall or the rail yards or wherever. And if you’re putting one out in the suburbs again, you miss out on a great chance of revitalizing what could easily become the heart of the city.

But the economy is terrible and the taxpayers are going to want the millionaires to pay for it and it’s almost become a lose-lose situation in some respects. The City Council seems to have found someone that will have some time to put together a new proposal but nothing seems to be giving much light at the end of the tunnel.

Basically, the Sacramento fans might be screwed here.

Stern’s quote above struck me as something to worry about. He knows the NBA hasn’t been batting 1.000 when it comes to NBA arena situations. He has regrets about what happened with the Vancouver Grizzlies and the debacle that resulted in the Seattle Sonics moving from the great northwest to the great plains of Oklahoma. If he knows just how disappointing the situation can become and that there potentially could have been things to prevent it, why not jump back in to the arena talks in Sacramento?

Back in 2006, Stern was calling the Kings “a ‘model’ franchise in the sport, ‘a spectacular success story.’” A little over four years and winning percentage of 33% later, the league’s office is nowhere to be seen as the franchise is slipping through the grasp of the city of Sacramento.

This is a fixable situation. Yes, it’s complicated and it will be hard to figure out. But it doesn’t mean it can’t be fixed. Orlando just put up a huge and beautiful facility for their Magic fans. Complicated situations can be fixed.

The effort from the right people just has to be there and be consistent. It was once there from Commissioner Stern and his task force. It just is no longer consistent because they decided to pull out from the mess and focus on whatever it is they are focusing on.

It’s not the responsibility of David Stern to get this done by any means. I just don’t want him being interviewed on The Basketball Jones a few years from now and solemnly stating his regrets on keeping this kingdom intact.

Cousins gets first ejection

February 10th, 2011 12 comments

Here are the two technical fouls that caused DeMarcus Cousins to get his first NBA ejection.

Video of the first technical:

And here is the controversial second technical foul.

Here is an excerpt of what I wrote on TrueHoop this morning on the matter:

In the spirit of the new tech policy, I’m completely on board with the first tech Cousins received in the game. You can’t really make a spectacle of the calls, and even though it didn’t appear he said anything out of line, he still ran from sideline to sideline and kept motioning for a changed call. Referee David Guthrie was on the side of the court Cousins ran to, and likely felt it was over the top with the way he was “protesting” the call.

It’s not the end of the world and it’s not really disrespecting the game all that much. However, it is the kind of thing the new tech policy is trying to curb and at this point in the season, players (even rookies) should know better.

The second technical foul is where the officials lose me. Cousins and Chandler are battling for position on an attempted free throw. They get tangled up like an awkward 8th grade dance before separating. Chandler’s elbow gets a little high into Cousins, but there really was no excessive contact made and no order to restore.

Yet referee Marc Davis comes rushing in from near halfcourt to hit the players with the dreaded and confusing double technical foul.

I know many fans will not agree with the first technical foul but it’s the right call. With the new policy (which I will defend as a good idea), Cousins can’t go making a spectacle of a call he views as incorrect. He has this problem and it’s amazing (considering his rookie status) that he doesn’t get T’d up more for it.

However, the second technical foul is extremely ridiculous and flat-out wrong. Marc Davis is a referee with enough experience in this league to not make such a lazy double technical foul call. You could argue that only Tyson Chandler deserved a tech on that play and I might be willing to listen. But the reality is there shouldn’t have even been a foul or double-foul call, let alone a double technical for two players getting tangled up and not overreacting to it. Chandler’s elbow was completely incidental and all Cousins did was get out of the way.

Reffing is a really hard job, especially in the NBA. Last time I tried to ref a game, it was a freshman-JV scrimmage during a practice. I have never felt so bad about any job I was doing. I can’t imagine how hard it is to deal with the speed of the NBA game while trying to keep a billion dollar industry as honest as possible. But this second technical has no excuse. It was a referee far away from the play with a bad angle overreacting to something he thought he saw but wasn’t actually there.

There is no conspiracy and there isn’t some bias against DeMarcus and the Kings here. It was just a case of bad officiating that cost Cousins a chance to finish a game he was excelling in. I doubt it would have changed the outcome of the game, but DeMarcus still deserved that right to try to help his team win.

Categories: Highlights Tags:

Taking Tyreke to task and other alliterations

January 26th, 2011 3 comments

(I lied. There are no more alliterations in this post – at least not intentional ones.)

Some might view this as an unfair criticism, but in a game rot with mistakes by the Kings Tyreke Evans really blew this one.

A line of 19 points on 18 shots with eight rebounds, fives assists, and only one turnover is not a terrible game by any means. In fact, Reke probably kept them in this game throughout with his ability to get into the lane. In the third quarter, the Kings really seemed to push the tempo against Charlotte and seem to get some much-needed momentum back on their side.

However, Evans had a deceptively disappointing fourth quarter and pretty much cost them any real chance at winning this game.

Maybe my biggest gripe with Reke in this game was the way he defended Stephen Jackson on the perimeter. It’s not like Stack Jack went off either. But Evans consistently went under the screen and allowed Jackson a very good look at an outside shot. This has been a consistent problem for Tyreke since he came into the league last season.

He’s actually a pretty capable defender for the most part. His isolation defense was really good last year and this season it has taken a bit of a dip in the Synergy numbers. But that could easily be chocked up to the fact that he was playing with a plantar fasciitis stone in his shoe. This season he’s been much better with defending pick-and-rolls too.

Trying to get Tyreke to fight through or over a screen seems to be impossible. Maybe it’s the defensive strategy of the team to do this, but I find it unlikely considering the Kings are 9th in the NBA in defending spot-up shooters, which is seemingly the majority of the times in which Tyreke is giving up these open looks. Against Jackson though, he gave up two key baskets when the Kings were trying to make their final push to get over the hump in this game.

The first jumper was off a curl screen around the elbow. Tyreke didn’t seem like he knew how to get around the screen. He started to go over the screen and then just gave up and tried to fight under Kwame Brown. It resulted in a wide-open 16-footer for Jackson and it pushed the lead back to seven.

The second jumper happened on another Kwame Brown screen. Jackson dribbled toward the top of the key and Tyreke started to fight through the screen. This time he sort of went over the screen but stopped when he could have been free of Kwame massiveness. Then he followed the roll man instead staying with the shooter. Jackson got another open look and knocked down the pull-up jumper.

Maybe these two examples are a bit extreme with Tyreke because there has to be team defense throughout. But it’s a problem that is just getting worse with his inability or unawareness to go over screens to contest shots.

Offensively, he made similar mistakes of indecision that cost them a chance at this game. Aside from his flurry at the end that makes the final result look much closer than it actually was, he got into a couple of bouts on being unsure of what to do.

A couple times in the fourth quarter, he seemed to be out of ideas. He’d dribble the ball, try to put a move on Stephen Jackson or Gerald Wallace and if it didn’t work, he just gave up and shot a bad jumper off the dribble. This is something that just can’t happen. Yes, his jumper is improved this season when he’s not in the middle of the floor but it’s still not good enough to be his safety valve.

That would be my biggest criticism of him this year. He’s looked for the easy way out with his jumper far too often. Last year, he almost didn’t know any better and would just overwhelm the defender with his physical prowess. This year, he seemed to be limited (understandably so) by the foot issues and had to rely on his jumper to get him through (which it didn’t). Now that he seems to be healthier and moving better, he’s still stuck in that mindset of relying on a jumper that isn’t a weapon yet.

These mental errors weren’t THE reason the Kings lost this game. They couldn’t hit shots from anywhere on the floor. But when they had a chance to make the Bobcats feel significant pressure in closing out this game, Reke’s decisions definitely didn’t help them capitalize on any of the chances in front of the Kings.

In the third quarter, we saw a Tyreke Evans who was a freight train. He pushed the tempo, got into the lane and disrupted a lot of what Charlotte seemed comfortable in trying to do. I would have liked to have seen more of this in the final quarter, rather than just a small flurry to make the score look better.

Horatio Caine on Kings-Blazers

January 25th, 2011 5 comments

I blatantly took this from Matt Moore in the DDL.

I just decided to put it to the comic meme of CSI: Miami puns.

It’s stupid, I know. But it cracked me up.

Categories: Kings on the Internet Tags:

Just because you are characters doesn’t mean you have character

January 25th, 2011 4 comments

I’ve always felt that if you’re a fan of a losing team it’s best to see some progress while still losing a bunch of games.

That’s what you should want from your team. It comes down to either being a playoff team or being a lottery team. Those are the only two options possible. So if you were not going to make the playoffs, why wouldn’t you want your team to have a chance at the best player available in the draft?

Moral victories are often a bunch of newspaper fodder to keep buzz about the team going. There has to be some interest in order to sell this team as a commodity. The team is selling interest to get you to buy tickets. The newspaper is selling interest to get you to keep buying papers and reading about the team. The blogs are selling interest in order to get page views from you. It’s basically one big Mad Men advertising project with Don Draper asking you to step into his office to see what size authentic jersey you are.

Moral victories essentially build character in a team but most importantly, they get the team believing they can win when in fact they aren’t winning. And the fact that they aren’t winning is really what is best because it gets you more ping-pong balls. I firmly believe in this strategy. Be competitive but don’t win 35-40 games. Winning 35-40 games is basically spinning your tires. Yes, you’re close to the playoffs but you’re also far away from getting that much better.

Well, the Kings have inadvertently been subscribing to my theory on this. They’ve been insanely competitive in games for the past month, while still losing a significant amount of them to keep their lottery balls plentiful and probable. They have blown painful lead after painful lead, all while showing even though they are good enough to be competitive they’re also just crappy enough to stay in the hunt for the #1 pick.

However, that can only take you so far with a young team. It’s one thing to blow a game to the Warriors in which you should have closed them out before letting it go to overtime and eventually losing. It’s another thing to come back the next game and allowing yourself to do the exact same thing. The young guys have to know their fight means something on some nights.

This win over Portland was one of those nights.

It seemed to be ripe for the losing. The Kings seemingly try to pry defeat from the jaws of victory quite often. They’ll fight hard for three quarters, get themselves a nice lead and then completely fall apart in the fourth quarter. It’s almost like clockwork. They commit a turnover here or take a bad shot there. Then the Kings start pressing themselves on offense, using up way too much shot clock and falling apart on both ends of the floor.

Against the Blazers, the Kings looked like they were ready to fall apart. They couldn’t separate themselves from Portland. The game hovered around a four to six-point lead for the Kings throughout a six-minute stretch the Kings would usually let seep out of their collective grasp. However, instead of the Kings’ usually collapse, they decided to rally against the Blazers on foreign soil and go on a big game clinching run.

Tyreke scored seven points during this 13-2 run to close the game. Samuel Dalembert blocked two shots to stamp his defensive dominance in this game. Omri tipped in a big shot and the Kings forced a couple of big turnovers. Instead of letting the Blazers come back and ruin another solid effort, the Kings rallied to finish off the game in a way that would make fans proud.

This doesn’t mean there is a turning point in the season somewhere under the surface here. Whether there is or not doesn’t really matter. This victory was just enough to validate to the Kings they are capable of winning games. If they had lost another effort on the road like this one, we’d all be trying to sell this to Kings fans as another notch on the moral victory belt.

It would be a character-building exercise on a team that is cast as a bunch of characters who don’t really fit together.

You know what builds character? Winning. Being competitive only takes you so far when you’re a young, bad team. I still believe you want to be competitive while losing a lot of games because ultimately, you have to get lucky in the draft with a franchise player to truly rebuild. However, every once in a while that competitiveness needs to be validated.

The Kings validated their own talent and effort tonight with a win. Maybe they go on a big run for the next couple weeks or maybe they continue to struggle in a lot of these games.

What’s important is they ACTUALLY built some character instead of talking themselves into believing they did.

Categories: Analysis/Commentary Tags:

DeMarcus Cousins will be great with rookies after this season

January 14th, 2011 2 comments

Look at how well he handles youngsters!

(via – SB Jake Whitacre)

Good to know he’ll be able to make Kyrie Irving smile next year.

Ever wanted to scare the crap out of yourself…

January 13th, 2011 No comments

… in the middle of the night when you’re getting a glass of water?

Go get the DeMarcus Cousins fathead right now.